
sidebar.wechat

sidebar.feishu
sidebar.chooseYourWayToJoin

sidebar.scanToAddConsultant
"The system is launched, so what now?"
This is the most critical and most easily overlooked question in AI implementation.
Many enterprises spend significant resources on AI systems, full of anticipation at launch, and then... nothing follows. The system is gradually forgotten, the team returns to the old ways, and AI becomes a one-time "face-saving project."
AI launch is just the beginning—the real challenge is continuous operations.
AI systems are not delivered once and then maintain optimal state forever—they have a clear "decay curve":
| Time | System State | Reasons |
|---|---|---|
| Early launch | Good results, users satisfied | Fresh parameters, fresh data |
| 1-2 months | Effects begin to decline | Data distribution changes, user expectations rise |
| 3-6 months | Effects significantly decline | Model not updated, processes not optimized |
| After 6 months | Essentially useless | No one maintains, system abandoned |
1. Data distribution changes Business environment is changing, products are changing, users are changing. AI models are trained on historical data—after data distribution changes, effectiveness naturally declines.
2. User expectations rise Initially users think "Wow, so amazing." A month later they think "Is that all?"—expectations are rising but the system hasn't evolved.
3. Lack of continuous optimization No dedicated person in charge, no optimization mechanism, problems accumulate, ultimately the system is abandoned.
To let AI systems continuously generate value, four major mechanisms need to be established:
Core question: Does the AI system's effectiveness continuously meet business needs?
Key metrics:
| Metric Type | Specific Metrics | Monitoring Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Usage metrics | DAU, conversation volume, user satisfaction | Daily |
| Effectiveness metrics | Accuracy, response speed, problem resolution rate | Weekly |
| Business metrics | Efficiency improvement, cost reduction, error reduction | Monthly |
Establishment methods:
Core question: Is the AI model continuously evolving, is effectiveness continuously improving?
Optimization directions:
| Optimization Type | Description | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Parameter fine-tuning | Fine-tune model parameters based on new data | Weekly |
| Knowledge base update | Update product information, FAQs and other knowledge | As needed |
| Rules iteration | Optimize alerting rules, response rules | Monthly |
| Model upgrade | Upgrade model for major version updates | As scheduled |
Optimization process:
Core question: How to keep AI project experience and capabilities within the enterprise?
Precipitation content:
| Content Type | Specific Content | Form |
|---|---|---|
| Best practices | Which scenarios work well, how to use them | Case library |
| Pitfall guides | Which pits have been stepped on, how to solve them | Documentation |
| Operation manuals | How to use, how to maintain | Manuals |
| Methodologies | Methodologies and frameworks for AI implementation | Training materials |
Precipitation methods:
Core question: How to make AI capabilities become the enterprise's own capabilities?
Transfer path:
| Phase | Time | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Dependency phase | 0-3 months | External team leads, enterprise team learns |
| Collaboration phase | 3-6 months | External + internal collaboration, gradual handover |
| Independence phase | 6-12 months | Internal team leads, external provides support |
| Autonomous phase | After 12 months | Fully autonomous operations, continuous optimization |
Key actions:
| Role | Responsibilities | Allocation |
|---|---|---|
| Product Manager | Requirements management, priority ranking | 30% |
| Operations Specialist | Daily operations, user feedback | 50% |
| Technical Support | System maintenance, technical issues | 20% |
| Role | Responsibilities | Headcount |
|---|---|---|
| Operations Lead | Overall planning, cross-department coordination | 1 |
| Product Manager | Requirements management, effectiveness analysis | 1-2 |
| Operations Specialist | Daily operations, user feedback | 2-3 |
| AI Engineer | Model optimization, technical support | 1-2 |
It is recommended to establish a dedicated AI Center of Excellence (CoE) to coordinate enterprise AI capability building.
| Cost Type | Description | Proportion |
|---|---|---|
| Labor cost | Operations team salaries | 60-70% |
| Technology cost | Cloud resources, model calls | 20-30% |
| External support | Vendor technical support | 10-20% |
| Benefit Type | Measurement Method |
|---|---|
| Efficiency improvement | Saved labor hours × hourly rate |
| Cost reduction | Reduced errors × cost per error |
| Business growth | Revenue growth brought |
Generally speaking, a well-operated AI system should have ROI turn positive within 3-6 months.
Reason: AI is not the main business, team has no motivation
Solution:
Reason: Lack of continuous optimization mechanism
Solution:
Reason: System can't meet user needs, or users don't know how to use it
Solution:
Reason: No mechanism for retrospectives and summaries
Solution:
Many enterprises ask: Why is "accompaniment" service needed?
Because continuous operations is something very difficult to do.
| Challenges of enterprises doing it themselves | Value provided by accompaniment service |
|---|---|
| Lack of experience, easy to step on pits | Have experience, know what to do when |
| No dedicated person responsible | Have professional team for full journey accompaniment |
| Can't find anyone when problems arise | Have support channels, quick response |
| Don't know how to optimize when effectiveness is poor | Have optimization methods and tools |
The core of accompaniment is "put on the horse, send it a distance":
The value of AI is not in the amazing moment of launch, but in continuously and stably solving problems.
To let AI continuously generate value requires:
These four things look easy, but doing them well is difficult, continuously doing them well is even more difficult.
This is also why we emphasize that AI implementation needs "accompaniment"—help enterprises establish these four mechanisms, letting AI transform from a "project" into a "capability."
enterprise.cta.description
enterprise.cta.consulting.description
enterprise.cta.implementation.description
enterprise.cta.footer